The fight over AI summaries is part of a larger struggle playing out in newsrooms figuring out where human editors still fit in.

Wikipedia halts its AI summary rollout after human editors raise concerns about credibility. Wikipedia has long allowed its (human) users to add and edit entries. Recently, it rolled out AI summaries ...

Perplexity Comet isn't the first AI-powered web browser to arrive. That honor goes to Dia, but thanks to the popularity of ...

Could artificial intelligence be the future of more reliable open-source encyclopedias like Wikipedia? A recent study in Nature Machine Intelligence suggests it might just be the answer. Researchers ...

A study reveals how AI chatbots like ChatGPT are reshaping human communication patterns and introducing new linguistic traits ...

To celebrate companies leading the way, Newsweek is proud to present the inaugural AI Impact Awards 2025. These awards honor 38 organizations across 13 categories for their outstanding ...

Customer service platform Zendesk completed acquisition of AI-native analytics company HyperArc to enhance its data insights ...

Humans say no to AI “Yuck”: Wikipedia pauses AI summaries after editor revolt The test grew out of a discussion at Wikimedia’s 2024 conference.

Wikimedia will integrate generative AI into Wikipedia services. AI will assist in reducing the workload for human editors and volunteers. Focus will be on enhancing quality control and technical ...

Journalism professor Tom Rosenstiel urges newsrooms to avoid the mistakes of the internet era and build smarter, more useful AI tools ...

Software AI Wikipedia pauses AI summary experiment after editors say it 'would do immediate and irreversible harm to our readers and to our reputation as a decently trustworthy and serious source ...

The fight over AI summaries is part of a larger struggle playing out in newsrooms figuring out where human editors still fit in.